Thomas Friedman has a lot to
say. And I agree with some of the things he advocates. Just not the reasons
behind them. He states that the 19th century belonged to Britain and
the 20th century belonged to the U.S. and he reluctantly admits that
if the U.S. doesn’t get its act together then the 21st century will
belong to China. I found it ironic that he was giving a talk about
globalization and how the world is flattening and our need to change or be left behind, yet he provides
such primitive reasons for us to connect further in this shrinking world. Our
motivations to innovate, imagine, empower and create effective systems and
inventions should not be based on competition or who’s on first. That is as
narcissistic and ethnocentric as us putting an American flag on the moon. Who
cares who got their first? When did it become acceptable to adopt this greedy
“me-centered” mentality? I mean, isn’t it self-interest and greed that got us
into a mess in the first place as a planet?
Yes, we need to be
innovating. We need to value our planet, develop young minds with the tools to
navigate this ever-changing landscape of technology and the world, but we need
to do it out of love for our fellow man and our planet. Not out of ego, greed,
and fear of being left behind. We need to innovate because our future will be
brighter, our world will be more peaceful and together we will flourish as a
global civilization. If we approach this era, thinking an instruction manual
for an antique typewriter will be applicable to a Macbook Air… boy are we doomed
to repeat history.
Friedman pleads for us to
“change our leaders, not our lightbulbs.” What difference does it make to
change our leaders if we are still operating in a broken system? We need to
change the infrastructure and if we wait until the “right” politician gets into office it will be too late. We
need to assume leadership. Not to say government has no place in modern
society. But responsible governance should start by individuals taking
responsibility and leadership in their communities. Our whole framework and
foundation for society needs to be rebuilt from the grassroots. It starts with
one person in the village. One determined, inspired, enthusiastic individual
who will assume leadership because he or she deeply cares about what the future
will be like for his or her family and community. We need to take ownership of
our communities instead of acting as passive participants. This extends to
every level of society, most importantly education.
Our curriculum should teach
process more than outcome, skills that apply to a wide variety of disciplines,
and problem-solving skills through project-based instruction. The role of
education now should be to teach a child how to fish and how to fish with
others. With a major emphasis on the “how” and the “collaborate.”
My hope for the future is
that people will open their eyes to each other’s gifts and view our neighboring
countries as neighbors who we can carpool with, have BBQs with and rely on
instead of neighbors we try to outshine out of insecurity and unhealthy
attachment to “keeping up with the Jones’.”
No comments:
Post a Comment